Advanced offensive security For organisations facing real threats
FG Risk Advisory is the cyber risk partner for organisations that require more than standard assurance. Tested by adversaries and trusted by boards, we deliver high-fidelity threat-led assessments designed for organisations where cyber exposure translates directly into business risk.
A practice built for work that cannot be commoditised
Most security testing has become transactional - automated tooling, shallow exploitation, templated reporting, and minimal adversary realism. Mature organisations do not need exaggerated risk language or inflated deliverables. They need evidence, judgement, and the confidence of advisors who understand how sophisticated systems fail under pressure.
FGRA was built for that work, and only that work.
We deliver bespoke offensive security assessments designed for organisations that have outgrown commodity testing and routine assurance. Drawing on sophisticated real-world adversary tradecraft, we help security leaders clearly understand how their systems could be compromised, where controls fail when it matters most, and which exposures represent genuine operational and financial risk.
We intentionally accept only a small number of engagements each year. This selectivity allows us to dedicate the time, focus, and expertise required to deliver assessments with genuine depth, creativity, and precision.
The work we accept defines our practice - and what we recommend defines our judgement.
The work matters at executive level.
The systems, decisions, or exposures in scope have material consequences for customers, regulators, capital, or operating capacity.
The threat model is real.
Scenarios reflect capable, motivated adversaries - not generic risk catalogues or compliance checklists.
The work demands depth.
The questions in scope require judgement, technical specificity, or adversary realism that automated tooling and routine testing cannot provide.
Evidence is preferred to narrative.
The buyer values reproducible evidence over assurance language, and is prepared to act on findings rather than file them.
Where a brief sits outside this, we say so - and refer it to a partner built for that work.
A practice shaped by real-world operations
Specialist offensive security engagements across cloud, identity, applications, defensive controls, and infrastructure. Delivered using advanced adversarial tradecraft and led exclusively by senior practitioners.
-
— 01
Red Team Operations
Goal-oriented adversary emulation against people, processes, and technology. Outcomes measured in objectives reached and detection windows.
-
— 02
Threat-Led Penetration Testing
Nation-state adversary simulation under regulator-supervised frameworks, including DORA TLPT and TIBER-EU.
-
— 03
AI & LLM Security
Adversarial testing of prompt boundaries, retrieval pipelines, and agentic systems with access to tools, memory, and external state.
-
— 04
Cloud Penetration Testing
Internal and external testing of cloud environments across Azure, AWS, GCP, and M365 - control planes, federation, conditional access, and the privilege paths that connect them.
-
— 05
Web & API Penetration Testing
Authenticated testing of business-critical web applications and APIs - authentication, authorisation, session integrity, and business-logic flaws.
-
— 06
Network Penetration Testing
Internal and external testing of corporate networks - Active Directory, segmentation, and the trust relationships that determine how far a single foothold can reach.
-
— 07
Mobile Application Security
Static and dynamic analysis of iOS and Android applications, including transport, storage, biometric flows, and the backend interfaces they depend upon.
-
— 08
Code Review & Threat Modelling
Source-level review and design-stage threat modelling. The cost of a finding becomes a comment in a pull request, not an incident in production.
Built for senior buyers who already understand the stakes
FGRA is positioned for mature, security-conscious organisations that require independent offensive capability, careful handling, and board-consumable judgement.
For organisations that need assurance before exposure becomes consequence
Engagements are selective and typically initiated through direct referral, board mandate, regulatory preparation or confidential introduction.